Why Real-name Authentication is Required to Open a Cryptocurrency Exchange Account

Many users feel resistance when encountering mandatory identity verification processes during registration on cryptocurrency exchanges. For example, when the platform requires facial recognition, questions arise: Isn't the anonymity and censorship resistance that cryptocurrency originally touted? Why is it necessary to submit real identities to purchase digital assets now? Even more concerning is whether asset transfers after real-name verification mean they are fully traceable. This contradiction becomes even more pronounced when recalling cases where ransomware publicly disclosed Bitcoin addresses but were difficult to trace.

After completing mobile binding, ID upload, and Google email verification on the exchange, the core concerns focus on two points: What is the true purpose of the platform collecting personal information? Is there a risk of data resale? These worries are not unfounded; after all, privacy protection has always been a core demand for users in the digital asset space.

Decoding the Underlying Logic of Exchange KYC Certification#

This article will analyze the real-name verification mechanism of exchanges from multiple perspectives and explore key points of user privacy protection. First, let’s focus on two shocking classic cases in the industry:

Case 1: HSBC's $1.9 Billion Fine
Mexican and Colombian drug cartels laundered over $10 billion through this bank, which also provided financial services to terrorist organizations and sanctioned countries like Iran and North Korea. Case 2: Standard Chartered's $132 Million Regulatory Penalty
Due to loopholes in its anti-money laundering system, criminal groups successfully laundered $265 billion in illicit funds. These two cases reveal the iron law of financial regulation—licensed institutions must establish a robust anti-money laundering (AML) system, or they will face devastating penalties.

For cryptocurrency exchanges, the fiat deposit and withdrawal channels make them high-risk areas for money laundering. If the platform has not established a strict KYC mechanism, it faces threefold risks:

Inability to provide user traceability data when criminal authorities pursue accountability.
Judicial freezing of funds accounts due to the inflow of dirty money.
Regulatory revocation of licenses, ending operational qualifications.

This is precisely why mainstream exchanges insist on multiple verifications—to prevent criminal funds from contaminating the trading system and to ensure the platform's compliance and sustainability.

Analysis of the Dual Defense of Privacy Protection#

Although exchanges have motives for data protection (reputation is their lifeline), users still need to build their own protective systems:

System Risk Prevention:

Operator data monitoring: There is a possibility of information leakage from the operator side during mobile SMS verification.
VPN backdoor threats: Free VPNs may steal device data and transaction records.
Email security vulnerabilities: Although Google email is relatively secure, secondary verification should still be enabled.

Platform Selection Strategy:

Prioritize licensed institutions (e.g., OKX holds licenses in Dubai/Singapore).
Verify the authenticity of licenses (beware of MSB licenses that can be purchased for $20,000).
Pay attention to technological investments (proportions of cold storage, applications of privacy computing, etc.).

Global mainstream platforms' compliance progress:

OKX: Fully licensed in multiple countries in the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
Binance: Global operations center established in Abu Dhabi.
Bitget: Strategic investment in the licensed institution OSL in Hong Kong.
Bybit: Officially authorized by the Dutch central bank.

For investors who have not yet established accounts, it is recommended to prioritize platforms with outstanding compliance:

1. OKX or Alternative Entry #

Asset Management: $17.1 billion (Q1 2025 audit data)
Trading Variety: 620 trading pairs (including 25 emerging assets)
Liquidity: $16.05 billion/day (dominated by the Asian market)
Core Advantages: Early investment from Silicon Valley guru Tim Draper, integration of spot/contract/option trading across all categories, and continuously expanding self-developed OKB Chain ecosystem.

2. Binance #

Asset Management: $12.85 billion (continuous net inflow)
Trading Depth: 780 trading pairs (38 newly listed coins)
Market Share: Daily transaction volume of $19 billion (global first in liquidity)
Technical Features: CEX/DEX hybrid architecture, BNB Chain ecosystem covering 2000+ projects, institutional-level API trading system.

欧易编辑部